Reader Response #3
Dyson has always been a household name synonymous with state-of-the-art and innovative products. The Dyson Hot+Cool™ Jet Focus bladeless fan heater is no exception. Retailing at £400, it has a height of 23.43 in (59.5 cm), length of 6.02 in (15.3 cm), width of 4.45 in (11.3 cm), and weight of 5.91 lb (2.68 kg) (Dyson UK, n.d.). The AM09 is a bladeless fan designed to warm or cool the user. With the Air Multiplier™ technology, the fan has no spinning blades or exposed heating parts, which makes it safe especially for children despite dispensing air at a speed 15 times faster (Salisbury’s Appliances, 2024). Despite giving users 10 different strength settings to choose from, the AM09 keeps noise level low, thus receiving a “Quiet Mark” distinction from the ear-conscious Noise Abatement Society (Gibbs, 2015). Dyson UK (n.d.) highlighted that the fan can be adjusted using a remote control, which is curved and magnetized to be stored neatly on the fan. It can also be switched off with a sleep timer of predetermined intervals, ranging from 15 minutes to 9 hours.
The Dyson AM09 is quieter and safer, with better maintainability and
energy efficiency than a traditional fan. Those features in tandem with finer
heating/cooling, make it evidently superior. However, consumers might find its
exorbitant pricing hard to accept when looking at a price-to-value standpoint.
For starters, the bladeless design yields finer air quality compared
to traditional fan heaters. According to Dyson UK (n.d.), air travels over an
airfoil-shaped ramp, concentrating its direction and creating areas of low
pressure behind and around the fan. The pressure difference forces surrounding
air to be drawn in, resulting in a powerful stream of smooth cooling air.
Anemos (2024) reinforces this by explaining that because rotating blades in
traditional fans creates unevenness and fluctuating turbulence when producing
air, in contrast, bladeless fans can avoid that and create a steady air stream
that is breezier and more comfortable.
Next, the bladeless design is safer and quieter. Without sharp blades
spinning quickly, there is minimal risk of injury or damage to property
(Megafurniture, n.d.). Taking safety seriously, the AM09 has automatic cut-out
switches that will trigger when it is knocked over or overheats (Dyson UK,
n.d.). This is paramount with the
presence of pets, children, or the elderly. Another key point is that the
absence of blades equates to a quieter and more energy-efficient fan. This can
be seen from the “Quiet Mark” distinction awarded to the AM09 by the
ear-conscious Noise Abatement Society (Gibbs, 2015).
Another advantage pertaining to the bladeless design is the ease of
maintainability. According to Anemos (2024), it is imperative to keep fans
clean to prolong its durability. Since there are no blades and grills to be
disassembled, cleaning is a low-risk and low-effort job. Dyson UK (n.d.) simply
recommends users wipe the AM09 with a dry cloth for cleaning. This is a massive
step-up compared to a traditional fan heater that requires multiple layers of
dismantling, with possible physical and electrical hazards present due to
blades and internal components.
Last but not least, the AM09 triumphs over traditional fan heaters by
being more energy efficient. Firstly, the lack of moving blades corresponds
with a lack of friction and power consumption, hence saving energy (Anemos,
n.d.). Secondly, the AM09 has a “Jet Focus and Diffused Mode” (Dyson UK, n.d.).
This mode grants the AM09 the ability to blast hot/cool air directly at a user
or disseminate it across the room. Something only a bladeless design can do,
allowing users to conserve energy if only a certain individual or area needs to
be warmed/cooled.
However, at the end of the day, the Dyson AM09 being a household
appliance will have its pricing be a big factor when judged by consumers. One
could argue that the AM09’s exorbitant price tag of £400, which is over 10
times the traditional fan heater, will seek consumers to find other
alternatives. An experiment by Crist (2015) highlighted that the £349.99 Dyson
AM09 took 10 minutes to raise the room temperature to 70 Fahrenheit while a £25
Lasko 754200 needed 30 minutes. This is a testament to the capabilities of the
AM09, but users might find it hard-pressed to pay 10 times more for finer
heating/cooling. An article from Dsouza (2022), where he analyzed a rolling
survey, displayed data that 78% of British and 79% of Americans concur price is
a factor when purchasing an electrical appliance, illuminating the role pricing
has on whether consumers choose the AM09.
In a nutshell, the Dyson AM09 being quieter, safer, and more
maintainable and energy-efficient, in tandem with dispensing finer
heating/cooling than a traditional fan heater, makes it markedly superior
(Anemos, 2024; Crist, 2015; Megafurniture, n.d.). But at £400, it is one of the
most expensive in the market, and by a factor of 10 over other alternatives,
which might make some consumers think twice.
References:
Anemos. (2024, January 02). Bladeless Fans vs. Regular Fans: Which is
the Smarter Choice for Cooling?
https://anemos.in/blogs/blog/bladeless-fans-vs-regular-fans-which-is-the-smarter-choice-for-cooling
Crist, R. (2015, February 12). Dyson’s newest air multiplier doesn’t
feel so new. CNET.
https://www.cnet.com/reviews/dyson-am09-hot-pluscool-review/#google_vignette
Dyson UK. (n.d.). Dyson Hot+Cool™ Jet Focus fan heater AM09.
https://www.dyson.co.uk/fans-and-heaters/hot-cool/white-nickel
Gibbs, S. (2015, April 15). Dyson Hot + Cool AM09 review: the world’s
best heater fan? The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/apr/15/dyson-hot-cool-am09-review-worlds-best-heater-fan
Rishad, D. (2022, September 19).
US/Britain: Which factors do consumers consider when purchasing domestic
appliances?
https://business.yougov.com/content/43856-usbritain-which-factors-do-consumers-consider-when
Salisbury's Appliances. (2024, September 19). Dyson AM09 Dyson Fan Hot
& Cool - Salisburys Appliances.
https://salisburysappliances.co.uk/product/dyson-am09-dyson-fan-hot-cool/
Comments
Post a Comment